Fault isolation in a redundant power converter

ABSTRACT

Aspects for isolating faults in a redundant power converter are described. An exemplary system aspect includes a first switch at an input of the redundant power converter for protecting the redundant power converter from a high input voltage, and a second switch coupled within the redundant power converter prior to an output capacitor, wherein efficiency of fault isolation is improved.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present invention is related to co-pending U.S. Patent Applications, entitled FAULT DETECTION IN A REDUNDANT POWER CONVERTER, Ser. No. 09/181,498, and FAULT REPORTING IN A REDUNDANT POWER CONVERTER, Ser. No. 09/181,463, filed on even date herewith, and assigned to the assignee of the present invention.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to redundant power converters, and more particularly, to isolating a fault condition in a redundant power converter.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Voltage regulator devices typically maintain terminal voltages of voltage sources within required limits despite variations in input voltages or loads. Industry standard voltage regulators, also known as DC/DC converters, are generally not fault tolerant, thus the output of the regulator goes out of regulation during a fault. Most of the point-of-load power converters in server systems, like the voltage regulator modules (VRMs) for Intel processors, are of the same topology: non-isolated, step-down (buck) converters with synchronous rectification. A basic schematic diagram of a standard buck converter is illustrated in FIG. 1. The distinguishing feature of a synchronous buck converter is that a lower switch S2 is implemented by a diode 10 in parallel with a field effect transistor (FET) 12. In some designs, the body diode of the MOSFET is used for the function of a discrete diode 10. In this case an open circuit, say due to a wire bond failure would also be detected. Switch S2 and another switch S1, formed by a FET 14, are controlled in a complimentary fashion, such that either one or the other switch, but not both switches, is ON, except for a small `dead-time` when only the diode 10 conducts. Efficiency is achieved by the arrangement, because the losses of existing FET devices are generally better than those of existing diode devices. The arrangement further allows current to flow through S2 in reverse, and thus synchronous converters can regulate down to zero DC load.

Many converters, such as that in FIG. 1, also use a control scheme called `currentmode` control, where output current is sensed through a resistor 16 (R1), which is normally in the range of 3 to 10 milliohms. The resulting information is then used to help control the converter and the output voltage feedback via control unit 18. A clock signal, CLOCK, in the control unit 18 sets the switching frequency and is the basis of timing inside the converter. The base period of the switching, Tclock, results from the clock signal. A switching node, V1, acts as a summing point of switches S1, S2, and inductor L1. Under normal operations, the voltage at V1 has a rising edge synchronized, except for propagation delays, with the clock signal and a falling edge set by the control unit 18. Excluding losses, during DC conditions, the period that the signal at V1 is on, Ton, =Tclock (Vout/Vin). The rectangular waveform resulting at V1 is then chopped down by a filter formed by the inductor 19 (L1) and a capacitor 21 (C1). In order to keep the output voltage ripple at low levels required by a load device, e.g., a CPU (central processing unit), the comer frequency of the L1-C1 filter is virtually always kept at least 10 times lower in frequency than the frequency of the clock signal.

Faults in a voltage regulator can be problematic and are usually not detected until the regulator goes out of tolerance as detected by a fault detection device coupled to the output of the regulator. "Up-time" is becoming increasingly important in servers as the servers take on tasks once performed by ultra-reliable mainframes. Redundancy is the typical method used to achieve a high degree of basic reliability in servers. FIG. 2 illustrates a plurality of redundant voltage regulator modules 20, VRMl to VRMn, which are coupled in parallel to a sensitive load device 22, e.g., a CPU, such that if one VRM 20 goes down, another VRM takes over. Without fault detection hooks to sense failures in redundant elements and a way in which to report them, however, redundancy is significantly less useful.

Isolating faults is also problematic. Prior art approaches typically use a diode on the output of the converter in order to provide a means to isolate parallel converters for fault tolerance reasons. Due to their finite voltage drop, "OR-ing" diodes to isolate a faulted converter significantly decreases the efficiency of the system. Further, the diodes make it nearly impossible to meet stringent dynamic load performance requirements of certain specifications, e.g., Intel specifications. Simply tieing the converters together offers one possible alternative approach, but the overall reliability actually decreases under such circumstances, since many faults in one converter may cause either an overcurrent or overvoltage condition, which brings down the entire system of parallel converters. While replacing the diode on the output with a semiconductor switch, such as a power MOSFET, has been attempted, the problems of the OR-ing of the diodes remain, albeit in a somewhat diminished capacity.

Accordingly, what is needed is a method and system for detecting faults in a redundant power converter, e.g., voltage regulator module, before the output voltage goes out of regulation.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides aspects for isolating faults in a redundant power converter. An exemplary system aspect includes a first switch at an input of the redundant power converter for protecting the redundant power converter from a high input voltage, and a second switch coupled within the redundant power converter prior to an output capacitor, wherein efficiency of fault isolation is improved.

Through the present invention, faults are capably isolated in a manner that allows better dynamic performance and higher efficiency. These and other advantages of the aspects of the present invention will be more fully understood in conjunction with the following detailed description and accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates a prior art diagram of a voltage regulator.

FIG. 2 illustrates a prior art arrangement of redundant voltage regulators.

FIG. 3 illustrates a fault detection and protection circuit in accordance with one aspect of the present invention.

FIG. 4 illustrates a timing diagram associated with the circuit of FIG. 3.

FIG. 5 illustrates a voltage regulator with isolation mechanisms in accordance with one aspect of the present invention.

FIG. 6 illustrates a parallel arrangement of redundant voltage regulators including management control for fault reporting in accordance with one aspect of the present invention.

FIG. 7a is a first arrangement of redundant voltage regulators in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 7b is a second optional arrangement of redundant voltage regulators in accordance with the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to detecting fault conditions in a redundant power converter. The following description is presented to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention and is provided in the context of a patent application and its requirements. Various modifications to the preferred embodiment will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art and the generic principles herein may be applied to other embodiments. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be merely limited to the embodiment shown but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features described herein. It should be further appreciated that the aspects of the present invention are described with reference to voltage regulators for illustrative purposes. The principles apply to any synchronous converter and, with suitable modification, to any switching converter that requires fault detection to support redundancy, since all converters have timing sources and a switching node.

FAULT DETECTION

A number of conditions may arise in a voltage regulator that result in a fault. As mentioned previously, typical regulators are limited because their fault detection circuitry only identifies conditions which result in out of tolerance conditions. Except for faults in the input or output capacitors of buck converters, (e.g., C1 or C2 in FIG. 1), diagnosis of substantially all faults within a converter is capably achieved by way of the clock signal and V1 signal before the output voltage goes out of regulation in accordance with one aspect of the present invention. Referring to the regulator of FIG. 1, fault conditions include S1 shorted or open, S2 shorted, control unit 18 drive failure in S1 (i.e., drive HIGH or drive LOW), and control unit 18 drive failure in S2 (i.e., drive HIGH only, LOW drive is not detected because of the presence of the diode 10, in which case the converter continues to operate but with reduced efficiency). In order to capably diagnose such fault conditions to before the voltage goes out of regulation, fault detection/protection is provided as illustrated by the circuit diagram in FIG. 3 with an associated timing diagram illustrated in FIG. 4.

As shown in FIG. 3, the signal from the summing node V1 is input to a receiver 30, which scales the magnitude of the signal V1 for the downstream digital logic of the circuit. The signal from V1 scaled through receiver 30 is input to a negative-edge triggered flip-flip 32, e.g., a toggle (T) flip-flop. A clock signal, CLOCK, from the control unit 18 (FIG. 1) is delayed through a standard delay device 34, as desired, and inverted through inverter 36 for use as the input to reset the flip-flop 32. Under non-fault conditions, a rectangular pulse is generated from flip-flop 32 as signal V2, which is HIGH at the rising edge of the clock signal. The signal V2 is then input into a positive-edge triggered flip-flop 38, e.g., a data (D) flip-flop, which is clocked by the clock signal.

Since a fault condition exists when there is not both a positive transition and a negative transition of V1 in the period of the clock signal, Tclock, a fault occurs and is indicated when the signal V2 remains LOW. Referring to FIG. 4, the lack of a negative transition in V1 is seen at point 42, thus indicating the existence of a fault condition at the time of point 42. The fault indication also appears as a LOW on signal line V3, which is the signal output from the flip-flop 38. To account for a possible no-clock condition, suitably the signal V3 is logically OR-ed through an OR gate logic device 39 with a no-clock detection signal from a standard no-clock detection circuit 40. Thus, when V3 is LOW and the no clock detect is LOW (indicating that there is not a no-clock condition), the fault detection circuit's output signal, FAULT, is HIGH, indicating the presence of a fault condition. While a fault condition of at least one clock period can be accommodated because, in redundant mode, the output current is half of a full load, and the LC filter, with a time constant greater than ten times Tclock (a base period of switching), buffers the output, the detection of a fault condition in accordance with the present invention successfully occurs without waiting for the voltage to go out of regulation. The base period of switching can be fixed or variable based upon control methods and clocking schemes (i.e. constant on-time control, constant off-time control or frequency modulation techniques)

FAULT ISOLATION

Once detected, preferably isolation of a regulator having a fault condition is achieved in accordance with a further aspect of the present invention. Potentially, either switch S1 or S2 may short. When SI shorts, eventually Vin appears at Vout, while when S2 shorts, eventually a ground potential of 0 V appears at Vout. Since one switch cannot successfully isolate both S1 and S2, separate mechanisms are utilized to isolate the input and the output of the regulator. FIG. 5 illustrates a voltage regulator with preferred isolation mechanisms. As shown, the voltage regulator of FIG. 5 includes fault detection/protection circuitry in the control unit 18 that represents the fault detection circuit described above with reference to FIG. 3. In accordance with the present invention, an inline switch 48 (S3), e.g., a MOSFET, is utilized on the load side of a failsafe fuse 50 as the input disconnection mechanism, while a switch 52 (S4), e.g., a MOSFET (metal oxide semiconductor FET), acts as the output disconnection mechanism. In operation, the switch 48 opens to provide isolation of the input when S1 is sensed as being shorted, while switch 52 opens to provide isolation of the output when S2 is sensed as being shorted.

When using MOSFETs as the protection switch, two switches are required, and care must be taken with respect to the body diode inherent in the MOSFET structure. In FIG. 5, the output protection switch (52) must be positioned with the diode as shown, so that if diode 10 or transistor 12 becomes a short circuit, then switch 52 would prevent the short circuit from sinking current from the shared bus, which it would not were the diode facing the other way. Since the preferred arrangement would not block an overvoltage resulting from a short of switch 48, the input protection FET must have its diode as shown. This situation, by implication, means that a single FET implementation cannot provide full protection to the user.

With the arrangement of FIG. 5, cases where input protection is triggered are non-destructive. Thus, under suitable logic control, a number of retries may be used before logically latching the converter off. Further, the sensitive means of the fault detection circuit are enabled. Additionally, the MOSFET 52 can be controlled in a linear fashion during plug-in to provide inrush current limiting for a converter with hot-plug requirements. Also, the typical resistor (e.g., R1, FIG. 1) for sensing current is eliminated from current-mode controlled converters by the use of switch 52. Overall efficiency is therefore improved, with dissipation decreased approximately 2 watts (W) in a 20 ampere (A) converter. Since a switch resistance no longer appears between the load and the output capacitor 54 (C2), dynamic performance is improved, and fewer capacitors are necessary for a given level of dynamic performance.

It is recognized that the position of switch 52 does not isolate the output capacitance 54 from the rest of the circuitry, so that a short circuit of capacitance 54 could bring down the system. However, such a situation is considered statistically unlikely to occur, since the number of capacitors has been reduced as compared to the prior art. Further, the power dissipation of the regulator is lower so that the remaining capacitors run at a lower temperature. Additionally, stresses on the output capacitor 54 are minimal, since output capacitance ripple current is 1 to 10% of rated value, and output voltages for this type of converter are usually quite low, e.g., in the range of 1.0 V to 2.5 V (volts), well below the ratings of 6.3 V or even 4 V capacitors. Also, the current and power levels available in redundant arrangements typically quickly open the output capacitor in the unlikely event of a is fault.

FAULT REPORTING

In addition to isolation of faults detected, reporting of detected faults is also desirable. As shown in FIG. 6, a system management interface control unit 60, e.g., a microcontroller, monitors the fault detection circuitry via suitable programming on an appropriate computer readable medium to access data on the condition of redundant converters on a given card, as well as source information. One of the features of a preferred embodiment of the present invention is to provide two converters on the same physical card. Whereas the typical first impulse is to connect the two outputs of the two converters 100 of the same card together as shown is FIG. 7a, in reality it is better to cross-connect them as shown in FIG. 7b. This allows you to hot-plug replace a failed card without bringing the system down. The data on the condition of the converters being monitored includes, for example, individual fault bits for each half of two redundant converters on a card, paralleling check, thermal fault bits, and pending failure. Source information being monitored by system management interface control unit 60 includes, for example, information on a manufacturer, data code, revision level, firmware level, part number, and input and output voltage and current of the regulator. The information may be accessed via an industry standard inter-integrated circuit, IIC, bus EEPROM (electrically erasable programmable read only memory), as is well understood by those skilled in the art. The system management interface control unit 60 may also be configured to perform the functions of the control unit and fault detection directly for the VRMs, if desired.

Pending or predictive failure analysis is also readily implemented with the system management interface control unit 60. Through the programming of the system management interface control unit 60, monitoring of key nodes within the converters results, so that tracking of the values on the nodes over time is achieved. Prediction may then be performed when the converter is expected to exceed its specification based on trend analysis of the data gathered by the system management interface control unit 60. Predictive analysis further functions well for long term thermal drift conditions and wearout of mechanisms in the converter components.

Unlike current interfaces, which are indirect via discrete components and bus expanders, the utilization of the system management interface control unit achieves more standard and ready access to the converters. With the IIC addresses hardwired to the converter socket, a total of eight dual converters may be addressed, which provides eight redundant power outputs or sixteen non-redundant power outputs. By way of example, support is thus achieved for four Intel Slot 2 processors or eight Intel Slot 1 processors, redundantly, or double the number without redundancy.

Although the present invention has been described in accordance with the embodiments shown, one of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that there could be variations to the embodiments and those variations would be within the spirit and scope of the present invention. For example, although the present invention has been described in terms of a synchronous buck converter, it is suitable in any synchronous converter, and with suitable modification, in any switching converter that requires fault detection to support redundancy, since all converters have clocks and a switching node. Accordingly, many modifications may be made by one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A system for isolating faults in a redundant power converter, the system comprising:a first switch at an input of the redundant power converter for protecting the redundant power converter from a high input voltage; and a second switch coupled within the redundant power converter prior to an output capacitor, wherein efficiency of fault isolation is improved, and further wherein the first switch isolates the redundant power converter from a fault in a third switch and the second switch isolates the redundant power converter from a fault in a fourth switch.
 2. The system of claim 1 wherein the fault in the third switch further comprises a short circuit.
 3. The system of claim 1 wherein the fault in the third switch further comprises an open circuit.
 4. The system of claim 1 wherein the fault in the fourth switch further comprises a short circuit.
 5. The system of claim 1 wherein the fault in the fourth switch further comprises an open circuit.
 6. The system of claim 1 further comprising a fuse coupled between the input of the redundant power converter and the first switch.
 7. The system of claim 1 wherein the second switch is coupled to a control unit and an output of the redundant power converter.
 8. The system of claim 1 wherein the first switch and second switch further comprise MOSFETs.
 9. A method for isolating faults in a redundant power converter, the method comprising the steps of:(a) utilizing a first switch at an input of the redundant power converter for protecting the redundant power converter from a high input voltage, including utilizing the first switch to isolate the redundant power converter from a fault in a third switch; and (b) utilizing a second switch within the redundant power converter prior to an output capacitor, including utilizing the second switch to isolate the redundant power converter from a fault in a fourth switch, wherein efficiency of fault isolation is improved.
 10. The method of claim 9 wherein the fault in the third switch further comprises a short circuit.
 11. The method of claim 9 wherein the fault in the third switch further comprises an open circuit.
 12. The method of claim 9 wherein the fault in the fourth switch further comprises a short circuit.
 13. The method of claim 9 wherein the fault in the fourth switch further comprises an open circuit.
 14. The method of claim 9 further comprising utilizing a fuse between the input and the first switch.
 15. The method of claim 9 wherein utilizing a second switch further comprises utilizing the second switch between a control unit and an output of the redundant power converter.
 16. A redundant power converter with fault isolation capability, the converter comprising:a fault detector for detecting a fault condition within the redundant power converter; an input fault isolator coupled to the fault detector for protecting the input of the redundant power converter from a first detected fault in a first switch; and an output fault isolator coupled to the fault detector for protecting an output of the redundant power converter from a second detected fault in a second switch.
 17. The converter of claim 16 wherein the input fault isolator further comprises a switch.
 18. The converter of claim 17 wherein the switch further comprises a MOSFET.
 19. The converter of claim 16 wherein the output fault isolator further comprises a switch.
 20. The converter of claim 19 wherein the switch further comprises a MOSFET. 